Peer reviewers are selected for their technical expertise and overview of their specific fields of research interest. This is an optional service to reviewers. In this partnership, reviewers can elect to have their transparent reviews automatically added to their reviewer profile on Publons. To highlight the skill and importance of reviewing, Wiley has partnered with Publons to give reviewers formal recognition for their contribution. We believe that this will result in a more transparent and accountable process. Unblinding will occur only after a manuscript is accepted for publication reviews will remain anonymous until this point (reviewers' names will not be disclosed for manuscripts that are ultimately rejected). We make peer review documentation (referees' de-anonymized reports, authors' responses and editors' comments) available alongside the published articles. JNR operates using a transparent review process. Referee suggestions from the authors may be considered. Referee exclusions by the authors will be honored as long as the total number of excluded referees are reasonable (i.e., total number of exclusions reflecting the size of expert pool for a given topic). This manuscript triage is essential to avoid undue burden on the peer review system. If deemed suitable for peer review, the Handling Editor will send the manuscript to external reviewers with expertise in the topic and methods. Submissions are assessed to ensure they fall within the scope of the journal and meet its requirements for transparency, scientific rigor and novelty. Submitted manuscripts are assigned to the Editor-in-Chief for prescreening, and then distributed among the Handling Editors (either Executive Editors or Associate Editors) based on expertise.Īll submissions to JNR are subject to stringent evaluation first by the Editor-in-Chief. Peer review by two to three external reviewers will be made after editorial prescreening. In addition, studies involving immortalized cell lines that are not accompanied by primary cultures, slice or in vivo work will not be considered as it is difficult or impossible to extrapolate results to normal neuronal populations. The Journal does not consider Case Reports or studies using herbal remedies/natural compounds derived from plants as these are difficult to reproduce. Papers will only be sent to review if the Editor-in-Chief determines that the paper meets the appropriate quality and relevance requirements. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are single-blind peer reviewed. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research, and its significance to the journal's readership. Research published in JNR covers all species from invertebrates to humans, and the reports inform the readers about the function and organization of the nervous system, with emphasis on how disease modifies the function and organization. The journal focuses on uncovering the intricacies of brain structure and function. The Journal of Neuroscience Research (JNR) publishes novel research results that will advance our understanding of the development, function and pathophysiology of the nervous system, using molecular, cellular, systems, and translational approaches. Download our manuscript: Improving Transparency and Scientific Rigor in Academic PublishingĮditorial Process Overview Journal Aim and Scope.Download the Author Guidelines as a PDF.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |